Off with their heads!

Much like the oafish Queen of Hearts from Alice in Wonderland, who belligerently demands the heads of all those who oppose her, Amy Mischler is at it again. If you can stomach the bile and vitriol, you can see on her blog that she's now, in fact, suing nearly everybody in the state of Kentucky:

Pike County Injustice Files: Mischler v. Commonwealth 08-CI-1039: General Factual Basis III.

Watch out Indiana and Ohio. YOU'RE NEXT.

We've been content to lay low for a long while, and will probably do so again, but we thought there was some ... interesting ... material in Mischler's latest post. Here are the offending quotes from that diatribe:

44. The Plaintiff spent forty percent of her income taking both the children to the doctor multiple times because Stevens refused to take the children to a follow up. At no time had Hall attempt to set motions for child support and health insurance on the docket after November 2005.

45. Unable to afford her son's medicine; the Plaintiff then exercised her First Amendment Right against Hall and Stevens for denying her child support prosecution against Stevens for eleven months from when she had applied with Hall's office. She was also protesting being denied access to the Courts. See Exhibit 6.

49. Judge Paxton convicted the Plaintiff of domestic violence for marching in public with a sign. See Exhibit 10.

Now, here's where we hope that Mischler will finally be taken to task and held accountable for her abuse of the legal system.

First, Astute readers of this blog will know that Mischler was not convicted of domestic violence for marching in public. The "conviction" had nothing to do with her marching in public. It had everything to do with her forcing her sick son to humiliate himself in public, holding a sign that demeaned his own father and begging for money like a trained monkey.

Let that simmer a bit, horrific as it is.

Now, is it just us, or is in't it curious how Mischler always manages to leave that part out? (As an aside, has Mischler ever returned the money she obtained from well-meaning Kentuckians under false pretenses?)

Second, Mischler claims that she didn't have enough money to pay for her children's medical needs, despite admitting to the Appalachian News-Express that Attorney Jonah Stevens was, in fact, giving her $800 a month AND had maintained health insurance for the children and was able to produce receipts.

Once again, another example of Mischler playing fast and loose with the truth. We can only hope that, somewhere, somehow, a judge or a court will have the courage to stand up and do what's right and hold this woman accountable.