Fish in a barrel ...

Greetings again, folks. We thought we'd take a bit of time to shed some light on more of Mischler's ramblings. Turns out she's got a whole new spate of garbage we can use as fodder, notwithstanding an attempt at insult she took down regarding her opponent's hairline. While it doesn't surprise us that she'd do as much, it would be akin to us making jokes about her weight - it's just too easy and, quite frankly, juvenile.

Regardless, here we go. Just a couple of quite ones tonight. You can read the entire posts at Mischler's blog site, if you can bear it.

1. You, Keith Hall placed a copy of google map as the first document in the open records request as page one. This map shows the my home address. I did not request a map of my home in the Open Records Request to you. By placing this map in the open records request; you stated that you knew where I lived. That is a threat against my personal safety and the individuals that live in the household.

Now, the interesting thing about this is, Mischler herself made a clear threat to her ex-husband's family, using the children as tool in said threat. She won't own up to it now, but it was clear as day, and you can see our previous posts for proof. However, sending someone a Google map with their address on it is now a threat, according to Mischler. We've long since given up trying to guess what goes on in her brain, but we find this laughable enough that it needs no further comment - especially when you become aware that Mischler's own father threatened her ex-husband with bodily harm in front of a group of witnesses.

Here's the kicker, and another example of Mischler just being completely being oblivious to the truth:

Third, how you violated my Fourth Amendment rights when you and my ex husband Jonah Stevens conspired to have me falsely arrested

Once more, folks, Mischler was arrested because she made an attempt to abscond with the children. They were missing for nearly twenty four hours, with nary an attempt by Mischler to contact the custodial parent. It's pretty simple law, folks - it doesn't take a law graduate to understand it (though one would expect a law graduate to have some semblance of a clue, assuming they had any amount of integrity).

But there you have it. She set them up, we knocked them down - our work here is done. For now.

Mischler intends to deny her children access to her husband's family

Greetings, folks - we've got a bit of news to impart. Mischler has once again shown her stripes and has shown the depths to which see will sink, and the extent to which she will use her own children as weapons.

We've taken the liberty of posting in the "I'm Innocent" comments section, and Mischler has responded. We've no doubt the comments won't last, as they continue to show Mischler in an amazingly unflattering light. And so we're reproducing the entire conversation here, with emphasis on noteworthy sections (including threats to Attorney Jonah Steven's brother's employment and the threat to deny the children access to their paternal family):

Trustworthy said...

"Innocent" like OJ?

Tuesday, March 06, 2007 2:14:00 AM

Amy Mischler said...

Yes for the world to know, I am innocent as has a jury deemed OJ Simpson.

However, I was NOT originally convicted by a jury of my peers. I was convicted by a single judge who had at least three ex parte communications as demonstrated by the official court record.

And unlike OJ Simpson, the prosecuting witness has no grounds to sue me. I am going to sue him for abuse of legal process.

And for the record, Trustworthy is my ex husband.

What does Bible say? Something about there is no sleep for the wicked? I was snoozing at 2:14 in the morning.

Oh, and by the way trustworthy. I will be putting an answer to your offer to settle in the mail today.

Tuesday, March 06, 2007 7:11:00 AM

Trustworthy said...

Thankfully, I am not nor will I ever be your ex-husband. But is it true that you're now attempting to criticize me for posting at a late hour? Why, I recall you having posted at late hours, too. See, some of us have lives and are forced to work for a living, so we can't always post in the middle of the day.

But nice dodge. You know you're not "innocent." May the Lord forgive you for what you're doing to those children.

Tuesday, March 06, 2007 6:24:00 PM

Amy Mischler said...

You're right. There were two times at which I posted in the middle of the night. I think those were in October, around the time of my preliminary hearings. I had nightmares due to my false arrest and did some writing to try to get the nightmares out of my head.

However, those two occasions months ago during a particularly stressful time are the exception rather than the rule.

It's funny how you condemn me for allegedly being a bad mom, but you don't condemn Jonah Stevens for having me arrested. Isn't it bad for the children when a father has the mother arrested? Moreover, he intended to have me arrested in front of the children. Isn't that bad for the kids too?

Please continue to pray for me Trustworthy, because I need all the prayers I can get to fight the corruption in the Eastern Kentucky Legal system. Also, pray along with me for my ex husband Jonah Stevens.

Once he was most blessed, but he took it all for granted. He planted bad seed, and its now harvest time and Jonah is going to reap what he has sowed.

Wednesday, March 07, 2007 8:55:00 AM

Trustworthy said...

Having seen what you did to your own son in the Appalachian News Express, I would say having you arrested was the best thing that could have been done for your children. It's a pity you've been able to manipulate the legal system to avoid real punishment.

You were not falsely arrested, and you know it. You are not "innocent" and you know it. What you seem incapable of understanding is the amount of suffering you are going to cause your own children. They are the ones who truly deserve prayers, and they are the ones who we're praying for over at truthiscrucial.blogspot.com

Thursday, March 08, 2007 2:30:00 AM

Amy Mischler said...

I just don't know what to say "Trustworthy". First, you speak as "we" which in itself is a little freaky.

Two, your delusional in your thinking. Kim Thompson, the attorney for Jonah Stevens had several ex parte communications with the Judge. That is manipulation of the legal system by the Petitioner. There is not one iota of evidence that I supposedly manipulated "the system" because I haven't.

Third, you claim you are not Jonah Stevens, then you must be his brother Terry Stevens. I am ruling out Trina and Chris because they are christians and wouldn't make the type of comments you have made on here.

So its like this Mr. Trustworthy; the writing is on the wall. Jonah Stevens is going to lose everything. And I am quite familiar with the rules requiring any type of visitation with extended family.

It's in the case Troxville Vs. Granville. A fit parents doesn't have to allow visitation with extended family.

You sow bad seed Trustworthy, your going to reap it.

Thursday, March 08, 2007 10:20:00 AM

Amy Mischler said...

Oh, and one other thing. It's my understanding that KET employees are non-merit and can be fired at will.

Thursday, March 08, 2007 10:21:00 AM

And a moment ago, we responded with the following, which we doubt will appear publicly:

Strike two, Mischler. We don't work at KET. "We" are a group of individuals who are concerned about the children, that's all that really matters. Though we must admit it amuses us a bit that you're wracking your brain as to our identities.

It is very interesting that you have now admitted you would deny access to the extended family for your own children. I'm sure Stevens will find that useful in court, as will he find it useful that you're engaging in an obvious vendetta, hoping he's going to "lose everything."

Are your children aware of your plans? I'm sure they'd find it interesting that you intend to deny them access to their own families. Tsk tsk.

The only real writing on the wall is that you care beans about your own children and are more interested in bringing down those who you perceive have wronged you. Your actions and your words speak to that much, and it's also clear you're willing to use your own children as weapons to get what you want.

That is why we will continue to put truth to your lies. Your children deserve better.

So there you have it. We'll attempt to contact the Stevens family so they can be aware of the threats to their time with the children and to their employment - perhaps they'll want to take legal action or contact the authorities. Also please note that Mischler advises that "fit" parents don't have to permit visitation by extended family. We're left wondering whether a "fit" parent would deny their own children medicine when they had the means to provide it? Or would a "fit" parent humiliate a child by forcing him to beg for money publicly?

Crucial Question #3 and a Truth Alert

Wow, it's time for a doozy of a truth alert, folks. First, visit Amy Mischler's blog post titled "I'm Innocent!!!" It won't take long. Finished? Okay, here's we go. First, a quote from Mischler (the emphasis is ours):

On May of 2006, I was convicted of domestic violence against my ex husband. What I supposedly did to hurt him was to march in public in a sign in protest against him and the County Attorney and purposely refused to give my youngest son his medicine.

Now, what's interesting here is that Mischler, yet AGAIN fails to mention that she forced her own sick child to march with her. And let's also remember, it wasn't just "marching," it was begging for money (we wonder if anybody who gave Mischler money has considered that she defrauded them?). Remember, she also "failed" to mention this fact in her low-budget horror film about Greg Stumbo on YouTube.

Since Mischler can't remember it, apparently, let's say that again, for effect.

Amy Mischler - not Greg Stumbo - paraded her own sick child around the streets of Pikeville, forcing him to carry a sign demeaning and slandering his own father.

Amy Mischler - not Julie Paxton - denied her own child medicine and instead chose to use the money given to her by her ex-husband to buy her own medicine.

Amy Mischler - not Jonah Stevens - failed to pay any part of her own children's healthcare expenses, despite having agreed to pay fifty percent as part of the original custody settlement (to our knowledge, she's never paid a dime).

Further, if you saw the News-Express story, you'll know the children in fact DID have health insurance, and Mischler admitted it herself. And yet, she chooses to leave that bit out as well.

So we're confident if you investigate this issue, you'll find that Mischler was not, in fact, found "innocent." Rather, she herself argued that what she did constituted "abuse" and not "domestic violence." Notice this passage from her statement (again, the emphasis is ours):

The new Judge appointed was Judge John David Preston. This Judge ruled that the EPO petition had "insufficient grounds . . for the issuance of a Domestic Violence Order". Then he ordered for the DVO to be vacated, which is a legal word for saying its no longer valid.

Note, the word "innocent" doesn't appear in that particular legal phrase. That's Mischler's concoction. "Insufficient grounds" does not consititute "innocent." A child was humiliated, and now Mischler's playing with words to make herself appear the victim.

So now it's time for another Crucial Question, friends, and it's a tough one, so give yourself some time to think about it. Ready? Here we go:

Q: Let's say you were a child sick with strep throat, and were paraded about in the heat on the streets of Pikeville, forced into begging for money like a trained monkey and carrying a sign slandering your own father. Would you rather call that "abuse" or "domestic violence?"

Chew on that a while, and see what you come up with. We're sure you'll be just as disgusted as we are over Mischler's claiming victory with regards to this event.

Stumbo stumble

We're sure the 'esteemed' Amy Mischler (or her anonymous alter ego) will attempt to make some hay out of the fact that we've recently rejected a comment to our previous post. But we want to make one thing clear - we have no interest in lionizing or demonizing Attorney General Greg Stumbo here. There are plenty of opportunities to discuss Stumbo's behavior and/or politics, and we encourage all to do so. But this is not the place.

We're here to discuss much more important issues. We won't sit idly by and watch children be used as weapons and tools for glory-seeking and attention-grabbing.

Stay tuned for more Crucial Questions.

You Tube or Lie Tube?

Though we're loathe to aim more attention at publicity hound Amy Mischler, we feel the need to bring this to your attention, folks.

Watch the ridiculous video here

With the assistance of the folks at the Hillbilly Report, Mischler has apparently put together an embarrassingly crude and rudimentary slide show pleading her case for the impeachment of Greg Stumbo.

Now, we aren't terribly interested in the fate of Greg Stumbo. He can handle himself just fine, we're sure. However we are concerned about the welfare of the children who are at the mercy of this notorious attention-seeking truth bending drama queen.

If you have the intestinal fortitude to watch this entire video, take note of one very, very crucial point. Mischler claims she's being retaliated against because she marched in the streets of Pikeville with a sign.

Mischler conveniently leaves out the fact that she forced her sick child to humiliate himself along with her. She even holds up the sign for "dramatic" effect. Further, she fails to mention that she put her own needs ahead of those of her sick child. To make it worse, she perpetuates a known lie and insinuates that the children didn't have health coverage, even though they did.

Mischler's need for attention is her own business. If she gains pleasure or a sense of achievement by making a fool out of herself online, then more power to her. But her treatment of her own children and her continued use of them as weapons in what ought to be a private custody matter is unforgivable and disgusting.

Sometimes it's YOU

Hi, folks - thanks for all the e-mails of support. We truly appreciate the kind words and are grateful for the time you've taken to examine the opposing point of view.

In a recent post, entitled Deputy Assistant Attorney Generals Janet Grahams Second Response, Mischler adds yet ANOTHER name to the list of folks who are allegedly trying to deprive her of her civil rights, or obstruct justice, or you know, just hurt her feelings or whatever. Honestly it's tough to tell sometimes.

It's patently ridiculous to believe that everybody in the Commonwealth is out to get you. The truth of the matter is, most folks in today's world are too busy dealing with their own problems to actively engage in dark, sprawling conspiracies.

Here's a tip, folks - if you find yourself making the same claims over and over, only to get rebuffed at every turn - maybe, just maybe, YOU'RE the problem. Not everybody else ;)

Think about that for a while.

The sincerest form of flattery ...

Greetings, friends. You'll no doubt notice the change in the decor here. Turns out Mischler has decided to spawn some mini blogs from her original (apparently it's easier to post libelous and slanderous comments when you have more than one blog), and she chose to use the same template we were using. We recoiled at the notion of anyone thinking we were associated with Mischler's blog in a positive way, so we decided to redesign.

If you check out Mischler's blog, you'll note something very interesting. She's criticizing Kim Thompson, the opposing attorney in the custody case, for notifying the court that she had a conflict with a previously chosen Guardian ad Litem.

That's right.

A new Guardian ad Litem was chosen, and Mischler views it as a conspiracy. Who among us doubts if the original Guardian remained that Mischler would NOW be complaining that Thompson had a conflict of interest?

There are some folks, friends, who work hard at playing the victim.

Another Mischler sighting online

Greetings, friends!

We've recently stumbled onto another site being polluted by misinformation, omission and misdirection. You can see the latest go'rounds by visiting the Floyd County Chatter forum over at eastkyforums.

This is a really neat site, and the folks seem super nice over there. So if you decide to post, be courteous to the regulars (We want to stress this point - remember, it's not their fault they're being fed misinformation).

You can see why it's important to remain vigilant if you check out Mischler's posts here and here.

Here's a particularly interesting tidbit, posted by Mischler:

She convicted of domestic violence. And all I did was march through Pikeville with a sign. (I think in legal terms thats called retaliation which falls under 1983)

Attentive readers will note that Mischler fails to note that she forced her sick child to march in public, as well. We can only guess how humiliating that must have been for the child.

Be aware that Mischler is actively editing her posts when she's called on the carpet. For example, she originally characterized the custodial interference incident as only returning the children a "few hours" late when, as we all know, she returned them nearly twenty four hours late (and failed to notify the custodial parent as to their whereabouts).

When called to account for the longer time lapse, she resorted to the "My public defender advised me not to comment" defense ... even though she had previously commented. Go figure.

If you post there, remember to quote her original responses when you reply, so as to preserve the original comments. Otherwise, the arguments have a way of ... shifting ;)

Setting the record straight

In a recent blog post, Mischler makes some very, very interesting comments. Here is one worth clarifying (the emphasis is ours):

I am being charged with felony custodial interference for returning my children to their father a few hours late. The Judge refused to dismiss the case, or drop it down to misdeamor like the statute says to.

The truth of the matter is this: In the incident in question (unless there are others of which we are unaware), the children were returned to the father (the legal custodial parent) nearly twenty four hours late. That's considerably more than a "few," wouldn't you agree?

Let's put this in context. Imagine going to pick your own kids up at school one day, only to find out they weren't there.

You call everybody you know, but nobody knows where they are. Nobody even goes through the trouble of making a phone call to let you know where they are. They're just gone.

Gone.

Would you then clarify that as a "few hours?" We think not.

The children were returned, this is true. But by all accounts, they were returned to the father by strangers whom the children had only met that weekend. Further, they were dirty and hungry.

At the root of all this, however, is another example of Mischler dodging all personal responsibility. If she had a problem returning the children, she could have made a phone call to alert the father where they were.

Friends, we have to ask you, is that too much to ask?

Crucial Questions #2 - Parental Responsibility

Hello again, friends. It's time for another Crucial Question! If you refer to our previous post, titled 'Mischler Allegations Proven False, you'll notice the following:

Pike County resident Amy Mischler, former wife of Pikeville attorney Jonah Stevens, lobbied in front of the courthouse and the county attorney's office Friday with her son and a sign alleging that her ex-husband will not provide medical insurance for their children. Mischler, unemployed, alleged that county attorney Keith Hall was giving Stevens "special treatment" because they are friends.

Now, as you know, Mischler's entire argument was proven false. Stevens had, in fact, provided health insurance for the children. Moreover, he had provided cash to Mischler as well.

But this leads us to Crucial Question #2:

Q: Shouldn't Mischler bear at least some of the responsibility for maintaining health insurance for her own children?


It's a crucial question missed by the News-Express, and seemingly everyone else who has covered this case. What do YOU think?

Crucial Questions #1

Amy Mischler is pursuing mounds of legal action under the pretext that it's all for her children. We here at Truth is Crucial aren't quite so easily fooled, and we hope neither are you.

So here's our first installment of Crucial Questions:

Q: Of the two parties involved in Mischler's custody case, which party forced a sick child to beg for money in public on the streets of Pikeville?

Granted, this is a bit of a rhetorical question, but it seems this fact goes overlooked. We'll give you some time to think about it before we give you the answer ...

The Mischler is back

I'm sorry, friends. We had thought Mischler's fifteen minutes of fame faded along with the former iteration of Pike Politics. Sadly, that no longer seems the case, and therefore we are forced to respond.

To start with, please view the comments we've received about our first two posts. Of course, these are all anonymous comments. But can there be any doubt that Mischler is involved? The comments themselves are of such an intensely personal (as well as spiteful, hateful, nasty and outright untruthful) nature that it's clear Mischler had something to do with their posting, whether directly or by proxy.

Which brings us to one of Mischler's previous salvos, the affadavit she filed in the proceedings to impeach Greg Stumbo. If you're very angry at yourself, or feel you need to be punished for some reason, you can view the entire insane document here.

[ Side note: It's a shame the Kentucky Republican party is lapdogging it for Mischler. Kentucky Republicans have a hard enough row to hoe as it is without shacking up with the likes of Mischler ]

Back to the topic at hand - here are two of the line items in Mischler's opus:

106. Mischler is a God fearing Christian and a member in good standing at the Boldman Freewill Baptist Church located in Harold Kentucky.

114. The only thing that sustains me through this ordeal is that my Savior, Jesus Christ promised that He would never leave nor forsake me.

Now, while we applaud Mischler's apparent reverence for The Lord our God, we find it difficult to understand why these items are relevant in such a legal document. Certainly it would be among the first cases where a public official were to be impeached because the complaintant was a God-fearing Christian!

Now, try to reconcile these line items with the posts made in our comments sections. It's difficult to comprehend how one can hold oneself up as such a good Christian on the one hand yet throw such deceitful stones on the other. If previous Mischler online behavior is any indication of future behavior, doubtless we'll soon receive more comments of similar quality. Stay tuned!

Mischler Allegations Proven False

From a story in the Appalachian News-Express earlier this year (the emphasis is ours):

"Mischler Allegations Proven False
Pike County resident Amy Mischler, former wife of Pikeville attorney Jonah Stevens, lobbied in front of the courthouse and the county attorney's office Friday with her son and a sign alleging that her ex-husband will not provide medical insurance for their children. Mischler, unemployed, alleged that county attorney Keith Hall was giving Stevens "special treatment" because they are friends.

Neither Hall or Stevens denied the friendship, but they did deny allegations of wrongdoing. Stevens provided the News-Express with documentation of his health insurance, which was effective for the children in February and will continue to be effective until July. Stevens also provided documentation that shows he pays Mischler $800 monthly for the care and support of the children.

Hall said the Pike County attorney's office sought a special prosecutor for the case from Floyd County and the office did fail to follow up quickly enough regarding the appointment of that prosecutor.

Mischler later returned to the News-Express and said that she had made a mistake and her children did have medical insurance."
Copyright 2006, The Appalachian News-Express.
- - - - - - - - - -

Truth IS crucial

A certain Kentucky woman is enjoying her fifteen minutes of fame these days, at the expense of her own children and countless others. It's time her comments were exposed to the cold, hard light of truth. Stay tuned.