Hi, folks - thanks for all the e-mails of support. We truly appreciate the kind words and are grateful for the time you've taken to examine the opposing point of view.
In a recent post, entitled Deputy Assistant Attorney Generals Janet Grahams Second Response, Mischler adds yet ANOTHER name to the list of folks who are allegedly trying to deprive her of her civil rights, or obstruct justice, or you know, just hurt her feelings or whatever. Honestly it's tough to tell sometimes.
It's patently ridiculous to believe that everybody in the Commonwealth is out to get you. The truth of the matter is, most folks in today's world are too busy dealing with their own problems to actively engage in dark, sprawling conspiracies.
Here's a tip, folks - if you find yourself making the same claims over and over, only to get rebuffed at every turn - maybe, just maybe, YOU'RE the problem. Not everybody else ;)
Think about that for a while.
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
Wednesday, November 01, 2006
The sincerest form of flattery ...
Greetings, friends. You'll no doubt notice the change in the decor here. Turns out Mischler has decided to spawn some mini blogs from her original (apparently it's easier to post libelous and slanderous comments when you have more than one blog), and she chose to use the same template we were using. We recoiled at the notion of anyone thinking we were associated with Mischler's blog in a positive way, so we decided to redesign.
If you check out Mischler's blog, you'll note something very interesting. She's criticizing Kim Thompson, the opposing attorney in the custody case, for notifying the court that she had a conflict with a previously chosen Guardian ad Litem.
That's right.
A new Guardian ad Litem was chosen, and Mischler views it as a conspiracy. Who among us doubts if the original Guardian remained that Mischler would NOW be complaining that Thompson had a conflict of interest?
There are some folks, friends, who work hard at playing the victim.
If you check out Mischler's blog, you'll note something very interesting. She's criticizing Kim Thompson, the opposing attorney in the custody case, for notifying the court that she had a conflict with a previously chosen Guardian ad Litem.
That's right.
A new Guardian ad Litem was chosen, and Mischler views it as a conspiracy. Who among us doubts if the original Guardian remained that Mischler would NOW be complaining that Thompson had a conflict of interest?
There are some folks, friends, who work hard at playing the victim.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)